Snippet data - viewing only, no editing possible


Label

Field name

Field value


Sitting_Date

05/31/2017 12:00:00 AM


Sitting_Forum


Snippet Ref No

SnippetRefNo

PPP00100

Selected Quill

SnippetType

14

Saved Quill

SnippetType_C4D


Selected Quill

SnippetType_1

14

Speaker Name

IndxSpeakerName


Business Category

IndxMainHeadCat

Bills

Sub Category

IndxSubTopic

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Bill 2017

Topic

IndxQHeadTopic

Second Stage

See Also

SeeAlso


Part1

TitlePart1


Part2

TitlePart2


Part3

TitlePart3


Volume

VolumeNo

953

Book No

BookNo

1

Pdf Ref

PdfPageRef


Default Business Index

IndexViewCategoryDefault


3 Part Title Business Index

IndexViewCategoryTitle


Default Topic Index

IndexViewCategoryDefaultSpeaker

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Bill 2017\Second Stage
Bills\Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Bill 2017\Second Stage

3 Part Topic Index

IndexViewCategoryTitleSpeaker


Motion Code

MotionCode


Motion Title

MotionTitle


Stage

MotionStage


Amendment No

MotionAmendmentNo


Bill Code

BillCode

B2r

Bill Title

BillTitle

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Bill 2017

Stage

BillStage

Second Stage (Resumed)

Section

BillSection


Statement Code

StatementCode


Statement Title

StatementTitle


Stage

StatementStage


Hour Indicator

HourIndicator

Not applicable

Procedural Instruction

Procedural_Instruction

No

Debate Adjourned

DebateAdjourned

No

Question Askee

QAskee


Question Asker

QAsker


Question Department

QDept


Question ID

QID


Question Reference

QRef


Question Speaker PID

QSpeakerPID


Question Speaker PID To

QSpeakerPIDTo


Questions Asked

QUESTIONSASKED


Speaker Type

SpeakerType


Speaker Name

Senator


Deputy


Minister


Witness


Chairman


ViceChairman


ActingChairmanD


ActingChairmanS


Speaker4Display

Speaker4Display


Speaker

Speaker


SpeakerPID

SpeakerPID


SpeakerText

SpeakerText


OriginalUnidSnippet

OriginalUnidSnippet

041281114A31EDF3802581310071A081

LastModifiedSnippet

LastModifiedSnippet

05/08/2019 02:57:43 PM

TopicIndex1stCategoryValues

TopicIndex1stCategoryValues

Snippet Contents:

Of course, we have now seen echoes of this with the EU-IMF structural adjustment programme called austerity, which was imposed on us when we found ourselves sucked into this cycle, and we are still affected by it. Members should think about what happened with our strategic investment fund here. We have to privatise as part of those investments. We have €4 billion but we have to allow the market into those investments and somebody else has to make money out of it. We are tied into that because of the strings that are attached in fiscal treaties and so on with European arrangements to which, crazily enough, we have signed up. The severe negative impact is evident and affects, even as we speak, our capacity to invest in social housing, health care and all that. We are restricted and denied the right to invest even our own money in the social housing we desperately need, creating the incredible irony that Ireland could build more social housing in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s when it was poorer - virtually a Third World country but where we had control over our own investment and expenditure - than we can deliver in the early 21st century.
We are beginning to get a taste of this, but the poorer countries of the world have been suffering from this since at least the 1980s and the 1990s. It has had a devastating effect on those countries. Now we are planning to do an Asian version of this, with China in the lead, India playing an important role and Germany, obviously, involved as one of the other big participants. We are a minor player in it but as the Minister indicated, we want to be seen to be part of the club with these big boys. It is interesting that the United States and Japan do not want to get involved in this because they see this as a potential rival to the World Bank and as part of the intensifying competition between the big economic blocs of the United States and the western blocs on the one hand and China on the other. Do not get me wrong. I do not feel sorry for Donald Trump and the US in its fears about the growth of Chinese economic power or a rival power to the United States but the point is that we should recognise all these big, super-economic blocs, which essentially are trying to engage in forms of economic imperialism and colonialism in their regions, as being a major problem for the world. They ultimately accelerate the flow of wealth from the have-nots to the haves, from the poor countries to the rich countries, from the working people to the big bankers, the big financiers and the big corporate interests that dominate in influence and with their positions in institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, AIIB, the World Bank, the IMF and so on.
This is a power grab by a rising power, China, to get in on the act that has been monopolised by the IMF and the World Bank, and to rival it. In the competition that is intensifying between the US bloc and the rising Chinese bloc, the losers will be ordinary people in those countries, in China itself, in surrounding countries and the surrounding region and indeed the whole world with regard to the environment. They have a callous, cavalier disregard for the environment and the consequences, as well as the rapidly accelerating gap between the haves and the have-nots on a world scale. This institution will further accelerate and intensify that mode of organising global economic activity. That is what it is about, namely, about China getting in on the act and us facilitating that. I do not think we should. I think there are better ways that we could spend €125 million to do things that we need to do here. I am not saying we should not use moneys that we have to help other countries that need support and investment but not via institutions like this, which are all about squeezing as much back out as they possibly can. These institutions are not about benign aid or assistance and solidarity but are about lending money to get back extortionate interest and to gain control over governments, investment policies and countries' actual physical infrastructure and services at the expense of the people and the environment in those countries.
I will conclude on that but these points must be made because this is a significant development. The sad history of the World Bank and IMF on the global stage over the past 20 or 30 years should really make us reconsider why we would want to get involved in another project of this sort, which is destined to do the same sort of damage that the IMF and World Bank have done.