Snippet data - viewing only, no editing possible


Label

Field name

Field value


Sitting_Date

12/15/2015 12:00:00 AM


Sitting_Forum


Snippet Ref No

SnippetRefNo

QQQ00200

Selected Quill

SnippetType

1

Saved Quill

SnippetType_C4D


Selected Quill

SnippetType_1

1

Speaker Name

IndxSpeakerName

O'Sullivan, Maureen

Business Category

IndxMainHeadCat

Bills

Sub Category

IndxSubTopic

1916 Quarter Development Bill 2015

Topic

IndxQHeadTopic

Second Stage

See Also

SeeAlso


Part1

TitlePart1


Part2

TitlePart2


Part3

TitlePart3


Volume

VolumeNo

901

Book No

BookNo

1

Pdf Ref

PdfPageRef

138

Default Business Index

IndexViewCategoryDefault


3 Part Title Business Index

IndexViewCategoryTitle


Default Topic Index

IndexViewCategoryDefaultSpeaker

1916 Quarter Development Bill 2015\Second Stage
Bills\1916 Quarter Development Bill 2015\Second Stage

3 Part Topic Index

IndexViewCategoryTitleSpeaker


Motion Code

MotionCode


Motion Title

MotionTitle


Stage

MotionStage


Amendment No

MotionAmendmentNo


Bill Code

BillCode

BPM2

Bill Title

BillTitle

1916 Quarter Development Bill 2015

Stage

BillStage

Second Stage [Private Members]

Section

BillSection


Statement Code

StatementCode


Statement Title

StatementTitle


Stage

StatementStage


Hour Indicator

HourIndicator

Not applicable

Procedural Instruction

Procedural_Instruction

No

Debate Adjourned

DebateAdjourned

No

Question Askee

QAskee


Question Asker

QAsker


Question Department

QDept


Question ID

QID


Question Reference

QRef


Question Speaker PID

QSpeakerPID


Question Speaker PID To

QSpeakerPIDTo


Questions Asked

QUESTIONSASKED


Speaker Type

SpeakerType

1

Speaker Name

Senator


Deputy


Minister


Witness


Chairman


ViceChairman


ActingChairmanD


ActingChairmanS


Speaker4Display

Speaker4Display

Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan

Speaker

Speaker

Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan

SpeakerPID

SpeakerPID

MaureenOSullivan

SpeakerText

SpeakerText

Maureen O'Sullivan

OriginalUnidSnippet

OriginalUnidSnippet

E14DDA7AEB2F299380257F1C0080DE5A

LastModifiedSnippet

LastModifiedSnippet

03/09/2020 01:37:16 PM

TopicIndex1stCategoryValues

TopicIndex1stCategoryValues

Snippet Contents:

We know the central role of the GPO from the reading of the Proclamation until the evacuation on the Thursday. That evacuation went out of the GPO into Henry Street, Moore Street, Moore Lane and the surrounding areas. Every step and few yards on that route tells a story of the various men and women involved – the Volunteers, the Citizen Army, the IRB and Cumann na mBan – who fought and defended so many places on that route until they dug their way through No. 10 Moore Street into Nos. 14 to 17. While Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street have been designated as a national monument it is the opinion of many historians, relatives, supporters and many others that the whole area is a battlefield site of immense historical and cultural significance and it deserves so much more than it is being given.
While Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street will be preserved as a national monument, that will be accompanied by the total obliteration of the laneways of history. I do not understand this disregard for places of historical significance in that all we want to do is knock them down. We lost so much of Viking Dublin, Tara, the Mendicity Institution and we very nearly lost Kilmainham Gaol. Are we now going to lose another area of great historical significance and for what – another shopping mall, another shopping centre in an area surrounded by shops and shopping centres when we see shops such as Clerys and Boyers being closed?
When I asked for the independent comprehensive assessment on the site the Minister refused, saying an assessment had been carried out. Who was it done by? It was the same developer who wants to knock down the whole area and would have knocked down Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street if he had the opportunity. It is the same developer who allowed the whole site, including Nos. 14 to 17, fall into dereliction and disrepair. The Minister also said in her reply that there had been detailed consideration and appraisal of all the relevant factors. I find that incredible because all the relevant factors have not been taken into consideration. If they were, we would be treating the whole area with much more respect in acknowledgement of all that had gone on, not just in Nos. 14 to 17 but on the surrounding streets and laneways.
The Myles battlefield report identified the whole area as a monument and acknowledged what happened on that journey, where so many people were killed. We have O’Brien’s Mineral Water building in Henry Place, which was occupied by the Volunteers. The White House was occupied and held by Michael Collins. No. 10 was where the first council of war was held and there was an overnight stay. The Bottling Store was occupied. Hanlon's – Nos. 20 to 21 – was where the surrender order was accepted by the Volunteers. O’Rahilly Parade is that most moving place where a letter was written from The O’Rahilly to his wife. How could we possibly say that a comprehensive assessment was carried out when all of that is being ignored? That area is the link between the GPO, Kilmainham Gaol and Richmond Barracks.
There is a need now for a more innovative, dignified, respectful vision for the area. There is potential for a historical cultural quarter with appropriate small businesses or arts centres in the area, and above all of that, housing because there was a time when people lived in Moore Street. That type of development very much complements the historic street trading tradition because a massive shopping centre with discount supermarkets is going to bring an end to the traders and the stall holders who are already struggling. The Taoiseach’s response to me on Leaders’ Questions was that the decade of centenary commemorative events must be inclusive, sensitive and appropriate. It is not sensitive and it is not appropriate to surround Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street in this most inappropriate way, by being dwarfed by a shopping centre. Permission has been granted for a hotel on Moore Lane, which means we are going to lose O’Rahilly Parade for what will be a service entrance to the hotel. Where is the appropriateness and the sensitivity in that?
I have been asking questions repeatedly of the Minister and I am not getting answers. Who valued Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street at €4 million? Why was it valued at that amount? Surely €4 million would have bought the whole terrace? Were the buildings purchased by a CPO under a State order? If so, why could the whole area not have been purchased in that way? Who has costed the restoration at €5 million? A contractor has been named for Nos. 14 to 17 Moore Street. I have made inquiries but I have still not received an answer about when the project went out to tender, how many tenders were received and who, why and how the particular contractor was chosen. The irony of ironies is that it is the ministerial consent order of the Chartered Land team that had in its plan the destruction of the entire area is being adopted.
Dr. Pat Wallace said that any consent should be mindful of the national historical importance of the whole Moore Street area. Seamus Lyham said the national monument exists within a historic battlefield. When the Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Jan O’Sullivan, was Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government she said there are specific guidelines in regard to developments that affect a protected structure or an architectural conservation area. The Imperial War Museum said the area is the only city-based 20th century battlefield site in all of Europe to survive and that is under threat now.
Dr. Wallace said that once one allows the destruction of buildings and their neighbourhood ambience, one cannot bring them back. We cannot bring them back if we allow them to be destroyed. It is okay if the Government does not wish to accept the Fianna Fáil Bill but could it come up with something that would respect the entire area for its historical significance because that would be fitting, dignified and respectful?